Garner and Brown Cases would have been heard in UK,Grand Juries abolished in 1933

images (2)
Americans current Grand Jury system was adopted by England,to properly identify criminal activity.In England, the Grand Jury was the citizens watchdog against negligent government activity.While the King could indefinitely deem someone guilty, the Grand Jury was created to determine whether there was evidence to prove someone was guilty or innocent.

Fast forward to the mid 1600’s Grand Juries were present in all American Colonies.The groups role was enacted by American’s in the Fifth Amendment for criminal activity here:

“No Person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury.”

So the Grand Jury had civil, local, and criminal functions in both of the countries governments. However, the Grand Jury no longer had been serving it’s original purpose in England. So England abolished the Grand jury System forever in 1933. Why are we still using an outdated system that does not serve public interest? There are recent calls for reform of Grand Juries happening in this country now. Today in New York City Millions will protest against the Grand Jury decision to not indict the officers that are responsible for the deaths of Eric Garner and Mike Brown. Decisions that could have went in a completely different turn if they were given a decision for a trial without a Grand Jury.
How do you feel about this finding?

If you want to read further about the abolition of the Grand jury in England read here:

For the NYC Grand Jury Handbook click here:


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s